| eumap.org |
|
|
EUMAP: EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program
>
Topics
>
Minority Protection
>
Reports
>
Monitoring Minority Protection in EU Accession States and Member States (2001-2002)
|
Monitoring Minority Protection in EU Accession States and Member States (2001-2002)EUMAP monitoring of minority protection in Europe EUMAP monitoring of minority protection was initiated in 2000 with the aim of encouraging an independent monitoring of the EU accession process by civil society actors, to complement the evaluations of the European Commission and contribute to articulating the EU's own human rights and minority protection standards. EUMAP has published two sets of reports on minority protection - in 2001 and 2002. As for all EUMAP reports, monitoring on minority protection was carried out by independent experts working in cooperation with NGOs and in consultation with minority representatives in each country. Monitoring was based on a methodology (available on this website) developed by EUMAP, with the assistance of an international advisory board. Each draft report was offered for feedback, critique and discussion at roundtable meetings organised in the monitored countries. This critical input then was then incorporated into the final reports, published both in English and the national languages, and launched internationally at the EU and nationally in the monitored countries. The EUMAP reports adopt the approach of the European Commission in addressing both non-discrimination and minority rights. Anti-discrimination measures are designed to ensure that individuals are not treated differently from others for unjustifiable reasons. Minority rights provisions aim to allow individuals and communities to preserve their differences so as to avoid forced assimilation info a majority culture. Anti-discrimination and minority rights are complementary responses to the problems facing minorities, who confront risks both of exclusion and assimilation. They may be properly thought of as aspects of a single comprehensive approach that EUMAP reports considered under the name of ‘‘minority protection.’’ The 2001 EUMAP minority protection reports addressed minority protection in ten CEE countries by focusing on the situation of one vulnerable minority group in each country: Roma in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia, and Russian-speakers in Estonia and Latvia. For each country, monitoring assessed the legislative framework for minority protection; its implementation in practice; and national institutions responsible for minority protection. Monitoring on protection from discrimination focused on the fields of education, employment, healthcare, housing and criminal justice. Monitoring on protection of minority rights addressed issues of identity, language, education, media, and public participation. The findings of these reports indicated that, in general, the accession process had been instrumental in improving minority protection standards and practice in candidate countries. Most governments have acceded to key international standards and many have carried out legislative reforms and announced programs to combat discrimination. Despite these positive steps, however, the report recommends that national governments of these countries complete legislative reform and take steps to ensure the real enforcement of minority protection laws and policies. At the level of the EU, main recommendations of the 2001 EUMAP reports are that common European standards in the field of minority protection need to be more clearly defined and articulated, and government policies and practices in this area systematically and regularly monitored. The first volume of the 2002 EUMAP minority protection reports embrace EUMAP's own recommendation that in order to be effective monitoring needs to be continuous. These follow-up reports on the ten CEE accession countries move from the level of general standards and legislation, and their implementation in practice, to government policies for minority protection and integration. The reports assess the efficacy of selected government programmes or national action plans adopted in response to the political requirements of EU accession, to improve the situation of Roma or Russian-speaking minorities in these countries. In each country, one national programme was selected and assessed in terms of programme content and implementation; the role of local government; programme evaluation and assessment; minority participation and representation; and public support. Although in most cases it was too soon to assess in detail the implementation and effectiveness of these programmes, a general problem identified was an insufficiently comprehensive approach to minority protection. Common issues affecting the implementation of the programmes included ineffective co-ordination; lack of capacity; lack of funding; lack of public support; and insufficient political commitment and will. The second volume of the 2002 reports follow the same methodology as the 2001 reports, but address the situation of a vulnerable minority group in the five largest EU Member States: Muslims in France, Italy, and the UK; Roma in Germany and Spain. These reports serve to emphasise another main recommendation of the 2001 reports, namely that human rights standards, including minority protection, should apply equally to all EU members, current as well as future. To request copies of the print publication of the 2001 reports, please use the Publication order form. Please note that the 2002 publications are no longer available in print, but can still be downloaded at the links above. |
Related Library Resources »Ethnic Data Collection: The Case of the Civil Service in Eastern Europe 2008-02 · European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ECMI Issue Brief on ethnic data and public services in the Eastern European area begins by outlining the importance of minority civil service inclusion in the general discussion of minority participation in public life. Secondly, it provides an analysis of how legal norms and policies regarding bureaucratic recruitment and promotion affect the availability of data on minority representation in civil service. Finally, the paper discusses the options and strategies available to the researcher in situations ... Belgian-Turks: A bridge or a breach between Turkey and the European Union ? 2008-01-31 · King Baudouin Foundation Migration is a fact of life, a helpful boost to ageing populations, but also a source of division. This study of the King Baudouin Foundation explores the identity of the different Turkish communities in Belgium. While emphasizing the potential of Belgian-Turks as “intercultural ambassadors” between communities, it sheds light on the lack of integration of some categories of migrants, like married women and the young. It suggests the development of inclusion policies directed towards migrants ... Statement of Core Principles for the WCAR Follow-up 2008-01 · The Magenta Foundation In this statement of core principles for the World Conference against Racism, Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (WCAR) follow-up, signatories pledge to work on a positive Durban review process without hate or misuse of Human Rights terminology. Up to now it has been signed by 47 NGOs. A School for All - The case for integrated education 2008 · The Roma Education Fund This biannual magazine of the Roma Education Fund aims to provide a platform for discussion, exchange and learning to all involved and interested in the education of Roma children. The journal does not retain academic ambitions but hopes to bring academics, activists, community development experts, education specialists, people involved in day to day education of Roma, Roma and non Roma, together in exchanging around concrete experiences and ideas. It focuses first on what works and ... European Arabs Launch Campaign to Stop Al-Jazeera Broadcasts in Europe 2007-12-06 · MEMRI A group of Arabs in Europe, likely Iraqi expatriates, have launched a petition to stop Al-Jazeera TV broadcasts in Europe. They accuse the channel of fostering extremism among European Arab youth and supporting terrorism. Iraqi exile Joseph Shallal meanwhile urged a boycott of Al-Jazeera on the Arab left-liberal Modern Discussion website.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| page top |
|
|
eumap.org is the website of OSI's EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program (EUMAP) and
an online centre for comprehensive resources, news, and analyses on human rights
and the rule of law in Europe.
|
|||
|
Selected icons: Crystal icon theme by
Everaldo Coelho
|