eumap.org
eumap
Monitoring human rights and the rule of law in Europe

Television across Europe (2005): Main regional findings and recommendations

Television across Europe today

Television – a basic component and gauge of democracy – is undergoing rapid changes throughout Europe. Public service broadcasters face unprecedented challenges across the continent, mainly the ever-increasing commercial competition and the emergence of new technologies, while the transformation of former State controlled broadcasters in Central and Eastern Europe has often proved controversial. Private television, on the other hand, is also put into question in relation to its programming and ownership patterns.

Main regional findings

Television remains the primary source of information for most people in Europe, despite the dynamic progress of new information technologies. However, the pivotal role of television in supporting democracy in Europe is under threat.

Public service broadcasters are compromising quality to compete with commercial channels, and many of them depend on Governments or political parties. While there are nearly 4,000 television channels in Europe, the television market is in reality highly concentrated in terms of both ownership and audience shares. In most countries, a handful of channels attract the vast majority of viewers. Ownership structures are controlled by a few companies and often shrouded in secrecy. Political pressure on regulators and public service broadcasters is widespread.

In Europe, universally available high quality programmes are scarce. Investigative journalism and minority programming are hard to find in both public service and commercial broadcasting. Newscasts are often tabloid, particularly on commercial channels. As a result, viewers often do not receive the information necessary to make informed democratic choices.

These developments jeopardise broadcasting pluralism and diversity, with the new democracies of Central and Eastern Europe most at risk. Whether the switchover to digital broadcasting will benefit the public remains to be seen. Digitalisation may instead enable leading commercial players to further erode public service broadcasting, undermining pluralism and diversity, as well as high quality content.

Main regional recommendations

On media policy:

  • National governments and international organisations should live up to their commitments to the dual system of public and private broadcasters as an essential element of democracy. Market forces alone must not determine broadcasting policy.
  • Governments and parliaments should ensure the political and operational independence of broadcasting regulators. The regulators must have the resources and powers to monitor broadcasters, and their compliance with legislation and licence conditions.
  • The European Union should establish an independent agency to monitor media markets and media concentration in the EU and on global markets.

On public service broadcasting:

  • Broadcasting regulators should ensure that the public service broadcasters' programming complies with a clear public service remit.
  • Governments and parliaments must ensure that the funding of public service broadcasters is transparent.
  • National media policy should include strategies for the development of local television stations and community media.

On commercial broadcasting:

  • Governments and parliaments should adopt legislation ensuring transparency of ownership of all media outlets, including external investors.
  • The EU should introduce legislation to ensure transparency of media ownership.
  • Commercial broadcasters should be encouraged or obliged to broadcast public service programmes.

On digitalisation:

  • Public service broadcasters should automatically receive licences for digital broadcasting.
  • Regulators should allocate digital licences to a diverse range of operators to ensure that dominant positions in analogue broadcasting are not extended.
  • Parliaments should adopt legislation to prevent the emergence of monopolies of operators involved in the digital chain - such as digital multiplex operators, television stations, programme packagers and software providers.

Monitoring reports

The 20 country reports are divided into the following sections:

  1. Executive Summary
  2. Context
  3. General Broadcasting Regulation and Structure
  4. Regulation and Management of Public Service Broadcasting
  5. Regulation and Management of Commercial Broadcasting
  6. European Regulation
  7. Conclusions
  8. Recommendations

The complete three-volume report and a one-volume summary report are published in English. Each country report is also published in the language or languages of the country, accompanied by a translation of the regional overview. Read or download the reports.

Not logged in
Media Policy Menu

Related Library Resources »

Amnesty International Report 2009: Croatia 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Croatia. The report affirmes that despite slow progress in prosecution of war crimes committed by members of the Croatian Army and police forces against Croatian Serbs and other minorities during the 1991-1995 war, the country continued to move towards full integration with the EU. Physical attacks and intimidation of journalists increased.

Media maneuvers in wounded society 2009-03-26 · B92 The iconic Serbian broadcaster B92 was founded in 1989 in the expectation of a new era of media independence. But Serbia had reckoned without Slobodan Milosevic, and the media became a key part of his nationalist propaganda arsenal. Along with other courageous publications, B92 survived the war into the new, more open media climate. But like society itself, the media bears the scars of war, writes B92 founder Veran Matić.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2008: Serbia 2009-03-25 · US Department of State The Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, submitted annually by the U.S. Department of State to the U.S. Congress, cover internationally recognized individual, civil, political, and worker rights, as set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This report on Serbia states that in 2008 the government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, the following human rights problems were reported: police brutality; corruption in the police and the judiciary; inefficient and ...

Report by the Commissioner for Human Rights, Thomas Hammarberg, on his visit to Serbia (13-17 October 2008) 2009-03-11 · Council of Europe Council of Europe Commissioner for Human rights Thomas Hammarberg published this report on his visit to Serbia, highlighting progress but also "obstacles .. to the effective implementation of human rights standards." In the report he proposes a set of recommendations in relation to the judiciary, discrimination, police behaviour and conditions of detention in the report. Hammarberg also touched upon the condition of the Roma, the issues related to media policy and disabled rights.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2008: Macedonia 2009-02-25 · US Department of State The Country Reports on Human Rights Practices submitted annually by the U.S. Department of State to the U.S. Congress cover internationally recognized individual, civil, political, and worker rights, as set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This report on Macedonia states that in 2008 the government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in some areas. Rule of law problems were seen in judicial and police procedures, including ...

 
 
page top
eumap.org is the website of OSI's EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program (EUMAP) and an online centre for comprehensive resources, news, and analyses on human rights and the rule of law in Europe.
Selected icons: Crystal icon theme by Everaldo Coelho