eumap.org
eumap
Monitoring human rights and the rule of law in Europe

Preface

The EU Accession Monitoring Program of the Open Society Institute was initiated in 2000 to encourage independent monitoring of the process by which the European Union is considering applications for membership from the ten candidate States of Central and Eastern Europe. The Program aims to contribute to this historic process by producing monitoring reports to complement the evaluations already being conducted by the European Commission, as reflected in its annual "Regular Reports" on candidate States' progress towards meeting accession criteria. The enlargement of the European Union is a positive development, and independent monitoring is one means of magnifying its beneficial effects, both within the candidate States and in the EU itself.


In keeping with the larger aims of the Open Society Institute, the Program is monitoring compliance with the political criteria for membership as defined by the European Council in Copenhagen in 1993:


Membership requires that the candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities.

In order to determine specific topics for monitoring, the Program looked to the Regular Reports to identify certain aspects of the political criteria frequently highlighted by the Commission itself: minority rights, judicial independence, and corruption. Monitoring was also initiated on a fourth topic of importance to both the Commission and OSI: equal opportunities for women and men.

Monitoring reports were elaborated by independent experts and/or organisations in each of the ten candidate countries on the basis of a methodology developed by OSI with the assistance of an international advisory board. This methodology draws upon existing international and European standards for judicial independence to provide a framework for analysis of corresponding legislation, institutions and practice in the candidate States.


First drafts of each report were reviewed by a national expert and the international advisory board. Subsequently, round-table meetings were organised in nine candidate States to invite critique of the drafts from government officials, civil society organisations, judicial representatives, and from the Commission itself. Where it was not possible to organise a round-table, the draft was submitted for comment by mail. The final reports underwent significant revision on the basis of the comments and criticisms received during this process. The Program assumes full editorial responsibility for their final content.

Not logged in

Related Library Resources »

Turkey: Government Amendments Will Not Protect Free Speech 2008-04-17 · Human Rights Watch The government’s proposed revision to the infamous Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code will not remove the article’s restrictions on free speech according to Human Rights Watch. Prosecutors broadly interpret the vaguely worded article and use it against those who have raised human rights issues or debated matters of history and politics.

Supervision of the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 2008-03 · Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers This first annual report on the supervision of the execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights presents an overview of the issues and statistical information in the execution of the main cases before the Committee of Ministers in 2007. It contains a thematic overview of issues examined in 2007 (Appendix 1) and a statistical analysis (Appendix 2). It lists the final Resolutions (Appendix 3), the interim Resolutions (Appendix 4) as well ...

Moving On: Overcoming Balkan Barriers to a European Future 2007-12 · Balkan Fellowship for Journalistic Excellence This publication consists of 10 articles that elucidate issues as diverse as criminal justice, environmental threats and sports and culture policy in South Eastern Europe, as well as subjects like visa regimes, labor flows and the politics of transport. The authors are 10 journalists selected from throughout the region to participate in the 2007 program of the Balkan Fellowship for Journalistic Excellence. Initiated by the Robert Bosch Stiftung and ERSTE Foundation, in cooperation with the ...

Major Conclusions from the "D.H. and Others v. Czech Republic" Judgment 2007-11-14 · Open Society Justice Intiative (OSJI) The Open Society Justice Initiative's analysis of the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights and why it is so significant. It ruled in November 2007 that segregating Roma students into special schools is a form of unlawful discrimination that violates fundamental human rights. The decision is the culmination of an eight-year legal battle during which the plaintiffs sought legal redress for the practice of forcing Roma students-regardless of their ...

OSCE Yearbook 1995/1996 2007-11-13 · Centre for OSCE Research (CORE) The OSCE Yearbook is the only independent academic publication dedicated to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, its work, and the issues that concern it. The Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg has published the OSCE Yearbook annually in English, German, and Russian since 1995. The issues covered in this yearbook include; the OSCE developments and prospects, the interests and the commitment of the OSCE states, conflict ...

 
 
page top
eumap.org is the website of OSI's EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program (EUMAP) and an online centre for comprehensive resources, news, and analyses on human rights and the rule of law in Europe.
Selected icons: Crystal icon theme by Everaldo Coelho