| eumap.org |
|
|
EUMAP: EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program
>
Online Journal
>
Features
>
2006
>
ADVOCACY: Are civil society organisations any good at it? (And what exactly IS it anyway?)
|
ADVOCACY: Are civil society organisations any good at it? (And what exactly IS it anyway?)
2006/09/05
Used in the context of civil society organisations (CSOs), the term advocacy has become something of a catch-all term, encompassing a wide range of activities carried out by NGOs. Advocacy can be broadly defined as activism, or campaigning, around a particular issue. However, its precise definition and content are still an evolving concept. To open a broad discussion on the theme of advocacy, EUMAP called for papers on the theme of CSOs and advocacy, and asked readers to take part in an informal survey. (Image © Kirk Anderson, www.kirktoons.com) SURVEY: CSOs and effective advocacyWe asked, what do you understand by "advocacy"? What is the key to effective advocacy? In your own work, do you have clear advocacy targets, or do you just 'muddle along'? How do media relations and government interaction fit into your overall advocacy goals? How is advocacy organised in your organisation? Miriam Anati, who is responsible for the advocacy work of EUMAP, reviewed the responses and identified the main points they highlighted - providing EUMAP's own take on each. We hope those takes in turn will spark further input, and she would be pleased to receive any comments or responses to the article. FEATURE PAPERS ON ADVOCACYEUMAP is pleased to publish two rounds of Features that analyse the opportunities and pitfalls that advocacy work presents to CSOs. A total of six papers include both overall analyses and presentations of individual case studies and examples of good practice. Every time, general lessons are derived from the individual examples, and overall considerations are illustrated with concrete examples. Part 1 – Lessons from the field; deriving good practice from on-the-ground challengesPublication date: 17 July 2006 GONG: Advocating for Change Supporting User Led Advocacy in Mental Health The NGO role in advocacy for the human rights of people with disabilities in Bulgaria Part 2 – Evaluating advocacy: Identifying effective strategies and assessing resultsPublication date: 5 September 2006 EUMAP: Advocating for Change. Some lessons learned in conducting advocacy in Europe’s transition countries Postcard from the Frontline: Lessons Learned in the Battle for Hearts and Minds in the New Europe Advocacy in the field of social rights: A story with a bittersweet conclusion |
Related Library Resources »Amnesty International Report 2009: Croatia 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Croatia. The report affirmes that despite slow progress in prosecution of war crimes committed by members of the Croatian Army and police forces against Croatian Serbs and other minorities during the 1991-1995 war, the country continued to move towards full integration with the EU. Physical attacks and intimidation of journalists increased. Amnesty International Report 2009: Estonia 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Estonia. The report states that linguistic minorities continued to face discrimination in a number of areas, particularly in the fields of employment and education. Migrants were exposed to harassment by state officials and attacks by extremist groups. Criminal investigations into allegations of excessive use of force by law enforcement officials were dismissed. A human rights organization continued to be harassed by the government. Amnesty International Report 2009: Czech Republic 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Czech Republic. The report underlines that the government again failed to implement adequate anti-discrimination provisions. The Roma continued to experience discrimination, particularly in accessing education, housing and health, as well as threats of attacks by far-right groups. There were concerns over inhuman and degrading treatment of people with mental disabilities. Amnesty International Report 2009: Finland 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Finland. The report underlines that women were not adequately protected in law or practice against violence. Asylum-seekers were sent back to EU countries where they were less likely to be offered some form of protection than if their claim had been considered in Finland. Conscientious objectors to military service were imprisoned. Amnesty International Report 2009: Denmark 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Denmark. The report states that the government indicated that it would consider relying on diplomatic assurances to deport people to countries where they could be at risk of human rights violations. The system for investigating complaints against the police failed to ensure a remedy for ill-treatment. Discriminatory legislation and practice led to a lack of protection for survivors of rape.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| page top |
|
|
eumap.org is the website of OSI's EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program (EUMAP) and
an online centre for comprehensive resources, news, and analyses on human rights
and the rule of law in Europe.
|
|||
|
Selected icons: Crystal icon theme by
Everaldo Coelho
|