| eumap.org |
|
|
EUMAP: EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program
>
Online Journal
>
Editorial Policy and Disclaimer
|
Editorial Policy and DisclaimerIn order to promote discussion of issues regarding human rights and the rule of law in Europe, the eumap.org Online Journal publishes articles on a regular basis. Contributions can be made in one of four categories. Featured articles are selected on the basis of We seek expressly to solicit a diversity of opinion on issues concerning human rights and the rule of law in Europe, with a view to framing and encouraging public debate and awareness. Calls for Papers are posted on eumap.org and distributed through the EUMAP Infolist; subscribe at www.eumap.org/infolist. They are also posted to other relevant mailinglists and websites concerned with EU and human rights generally, and the topic at issue in particular. Articles are selected by EUMAP, edited for style and language, and fact-checked for accuracy where possible (please see the disclaimer below). Accepted authors will receive an honorarium of EUR 200. Editorial guidelines for featured articles In the case of both Calls for Papers and commissioned articles, the decision to publish is based on the following criteria of academic merit: - Quality of content eumap.org Features are expected to be independent and critical assessments of a topic by an individual author. They should be adequately referenced, with citations for all assertions, in the form of endnotes (see editorial guidelines on endnotes) eumap.org Features will present a consistent argument relevant to the topic at hand. Though there is no obligatory framework to follow, Features will in most cases outline a problem or omission or highlight an example of good practice in approaching one, describe relevant policy developments or the lack thereof, and define successes and failures in strategies to tackle said problem or omission. They should recommend, in conclusion, possible ways to change practice, implement new solutions or make optimal use of a good example. Featured articles should be approximately 2,000 words. They should be written in English and adhere to UK British spelling. Features are requested to be original articles, which have not been published elsewhere before. eumap.org occasionally receives offers of articles that are not related to any Call for Papers. The new section Submitted Articles expands the Online Journal's scope so we can henceforth publish such contributions as well, separately from the Journal's regular Features, if they relate to issues of human rights and the rule of law and meet eumap.org standards of publication. As with Features, Submitted Articles will encompass an independent and critical perspective. But the scope of the article can be more flexible, allowing, for example, for presentations of individual projects, a more column-like set-up, or one-off reflections on issues outside the framework of the thematically grouped Features. We do request for articles to sketch a context beyond the single project or the event of the day. The suggestion of lessons to learn or recommendations for other NGO's is valued. Images can be included; refer to the example of this webpage to see what acceptable image sizes would be. The length of the article can also be more variable than in the case of Featured articles, but should not surpass 3,000 words. Furthermore, unlike with Features, the authors are free to republish the article in other publications or through other media. If Submitted Articles are written in English, they should adhere to UK British spelling. If you would like to submit an article in another language, contact us to explore whether there is an opportunity to do so. There is no honorarium for Submitted Articles. eumap.org encourages users to submit their own book reviews. The Book Reviews section is meant to provide up-to-date information and concise critique on relevant new books on any topic related to human rights and the rule of law in Europe. For conditions and guidelines on the format of the book review, refer to this Call for Book Reviews. For announcements of events, job opportunities, publications, grant opportunities and other such news, items can be added to the eumap.org Noticeboard. No editorial policy applies, though eumap.org reserves the right to refuse items it considers not to fit within the objectives of the site. Please allow for a few days for your item to appear online. DisclaimerThe views expressed in articles published on eumap.org are those of the authors alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of eumap.org or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of the EU Monitoring & Advocacy Program, OSI-Budapest, or any entity of, or affiliated with, the Soros foundations network. |
Related Library Resources »Amnesty International Report 2009: Croatia 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Croatia. The report affirmes that despite slow progress in prosecution of war crimes committed by members of the Croatian Army and police forces against Croatian Serbs and other minorities during the 1991-1995 war, the country continued to move towards full integration with the EU. Physical attacks and intimidation of journalists increased. Amnesty International Report 2009: Estonia 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Estonia. The report states that linguistic minorities continued to face discrimination in a number of areas, particularly in the fields of employment and education. Migrants were exposed to harassment by state officials and attacks by extremist groups. Criminal investigations into allegations of excessive use of force by law enforcement officials were dismissed. A human rights organization continued to be harassed by the government. Amnesty International Report 2009: Czech Republic 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Czech Republic. The report underlines that the government again failed to implement adequate anti-discrimination provisions. The Roma continued to experience discrimination, particularly in accessing education, housing and health, as well as threats of attacks by far-right groups. There were concerns over inhuman and degrading treatment of people with mental disabilities. Amnesty International Report 2009: Finland 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Finland. The report underlines that women were not adequately protected in law or practice against violence. Asylum-seekers were sent back to EU countries where they were less likely to be offered some form of protection than if their claim had been considered in Finland. Conscientious objectors to military service were imprisoned. Amnesty International Report 2009: Denmark 2009-05-28 · Amnesty International (AI) Amnesty International’s Report 2009 evaluates the human rights situation throughout 2008 in Denmark. The report states that the government indicated that it would consider relying on diplomatic assurances to deport people to countries where they could be at risk of human rights violations. The system for investigating complaints against the police failed to ensure a remedy for ill-treatment. Discriminatory legislation and practice led to a lack of protection for survivors of rape.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| page top |
|
|
eumap.org is the website of OSI's EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program (EUMAP) and
an online centre for comprehensive resources, news, and analyses on human rights
and the rule of law in Europe.
|
|||
|
Selected icons: Crystal icon theme by
Everaldo Coelho
|